Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/message/VC5SOBSPKCAF5SCI3AE3SD5FZTNTYYOT/

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-12/

Several rubygem packages suffered from an issue with ruby 3.0 = https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180528 . The fix by darix is on the way.


I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210129/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 13929 (+88)
build-tried: 13922 (+92)
build-failed: 30 (-2)
build-n-a: 130 (+1)
build-succeeded: 13762 (+93)
build-official-failed+na: 294 (+125)
build-compare-failed: 436 (+13)
build-compare-succeeded: 13326 (+80)
verify-failed: 508 (-3)
verified-semi-reproducible: 12946 (+162)
bit-by-bit-identical: 13198 (+79)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 564 (+14)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 564 (+14)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210129/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210129/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
3 were in ring0
47 were in ring1

That makes it 50/3247 => 1.54 %
which is below the overall average of
436/13762 => 3.17 %

564/13762 => 4.10 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible


Newly reproducible core packages:

php7 https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/6564

xapian-bindings


Still bad:
yodl suffering from pdf toolchain timestamp issues somewhere in latex->dvips->ps2pdf