Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/VDQKQ2CTOBGMYJMCA6QR7WDMMFBXWXB7/

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-01/

I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210227/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 13909 (-20)
build-tried: 13900 (-22)
build-failed: 81 (+51)
build-n-a: 135 (+5)
build-succeeded: 13684 (-78)
build-official-failed+na: 393 (+99)
build-compare-failed: 433 (-3)
build-compare-succeeded: 13251 (-75)
verify-failed: 497 (-11)
verified-semi-reproducible: 12871 (-75)
bit-by-bit-identical: 13119 (-79)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 565 (+1)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 565 (+1)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210227/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210227/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
3 were in ring0
45 were in ring1

That makes it 48/3247 => 1.48 %
which is below the overall average of
433/13684 => 3.16 %

565/13684 => 4.13 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible

newly unreproducible core packages:
containerd:
  becomes reproducible with BuildRequires:  go1.15
  https://github.com/golang/go/issues/42159

python-numpy:
  .pyc files are nondeterministic again/still


newly reproducible core packages:
kopete:
  might still be affected by
  https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-83186
  but 1-bit nondeterminism can go unnoticed

rubygem-nokogiri
  https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180528